Vaccine Hesitancy
A key strategy in managing the COVID-19 pandemic is vaccinating as many people as possible. One key barrier to that goal is vaccine hesitancy--that is, people's reluctance to be vaccinated even when the vaccine is available to them. However, data on vaccine hesitancy are lacking and fragmented, particularly in low and middle income countries (L(M)ICs). The goal of this project, a partnership with the Center for Global Health Equity and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, is to better understand distributions and scales of vaccine hesitancy in select L(M)ICs.
Rego, Ryan, Yuri M. Zhukov, Kyrani A. Reneau, Amy Pienta, Kristina L. Rice, Patrick Brady, Geoffrey H. Siwo, Peninah Wanjiku Wachira, Amina Abubakar, Ken Kollman & Akbar K. Waljee, "Promoting Data Harmonization to Evaluate Vaccine Hesitancy in LMICs: Approach and Applications," BMC Medical Research Methodology 23, no. 278 (2023). doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02088-z
Background
Factors influencing the health of populations are subjects of interdisciplinary study. However, datasets relevant to public health often lack interdisciplinary breath. It is difficult to combine data on health outcomes with datasets on potentially important contextual factors, like political violence or development, due to incompatible levels of geographic support; differing data formats and structures; differences in sampling procedures and wording; and the stability of temporal trends. We present a computational package to combine spatially misaligned datasets, and provide an illustrative analysis of multi-dimensional factors in health outcomes.
Methods
We rely on a new software toolkit, Sub-National Geospatial Data Archive (SUNGEO), to combine data across disciplinary domains and demonstrate a use case on vaccine hesitancy in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). We use data from the World Bank’s High Frequency Phone Surveys (HFPS) from Kenya, Indonesia, and Malawi. We curate and combine these surveys with data on political violence, elections, economic development, and other contextual factors, using SUNGEO. We then develop a stochastic model to analyze the integrated data and evaluate 1) the stability of vaccination preferences in all three countries over time, and 2) the association between local contextual factors and vaccination preferences.
Results
In all three countries, vaccine-acceptance is more persistent than vaccine-hesitancy from round to round: the long-run probability of staying vaccine-acceptant (hesitant) was 0.96 (0.65) in Indonesia, 0.89 (0.21) in Kenya, and 0.76 (0.40) in Malawi. However, vaccine acceptance was significantly less durable in areas exposed to political violence, with percentage point differences (ppd) in vaccine acceptance of -10 (Indonesia), -5 (Kenya), and -64 (Malawi). In Indonesia and Kenya, although not Malawi, vaccine acceptance was also significantly less durable in locations without competitive elections (-19 and -6 ppd, respectively) and in locations with more limited transportation infrastructure (-11 and -8 ppd).
Conclusion
With SUNGEO, researchers can combine spatially misaligned and incompatible datasets. As an illustrative example, we find that vaccination hesitancy is correlated with political violence, electoral uncompetitiveness and limited access to public goods, consistent with past results that vaccination hesitancy is associated with government distrust.
Data
Dataset | Link |
---|---|
COVID-19 High Frequency Phone Survey of Households, Ethiopia, 2020-2021 | ICPSR 38419 |
COVID-19 High Frequency Phone Survey of Households, Indonesia, 2020-2021 | ICPSR 38463 |
COVID-19 High Frequency Phone Survey of Households, Kenya, 2020-2021 | ICPSR 38476 |
COVID-19 High Frequency Phone Survey of Households, Malawi, 2020-2021 | ICPSR 38462 |